Gartner VP Addresses Prerequisites for Developing Corporate Social Media Policies

Carol Rozwell might be my personal hero, well-respected and distinguished Gartner analyst. "Social media offers tempting opportunities to interact with employees, business partners, customers, prospects and a whole host of anonymous participants on the social Web," said the analyst and vice-president recently,  "However, those who participate in social media need guidance from their employer about the rules, responsibilities, ‘norms’ and behaviors expected of them, and these topics are commonly covered in the social media policy."

Gartner has identified seven critical questions that designers of social media policy must ask themselves:

What Is Our Organization’s Strategy for Social Media?
There are many possible purposes for social media. It can be used for five levels of increasingly involved interaction (ranging from monitoring to co-creation) and across four different constituencies (employees, business partners, customers and prospects, and the social Web). It is critical that social media leaders determine the purpose of their initiatives before they deploy them and that those responsible for social media initiatives articulate how the organization’s mission, strategy, values and desired outcomes inform and impact on these initiatives. A social media strategy plan is one means of conveying this information.

Who Will Write and Revise the Policy?
Some organizations assign policy writing to the CIO, others have decided it’s the general counsel’s job, while in other cases, a self-appointed committee decides to craft a policy. It’s useful to gain agreement about who is responsible, accountable, consulted and involved before beginning work on the policy and, where possible, a cross-section of the company’s population should be involved in the policy creation process. It’s important to remember that there is a difference between policy — which states do’s and don’ts at a high level — and operational processes, such as recruitment or customer support — which may use social media. These operational processes need to be flexible and changeable and adhere to the policy, but each department/activity will need to work out specific governance and process guidelines.

How Will We Vet the Policy?
Getting broad feedback on the policy serves two purposes. First, it ensures that multiple disparate interests such as legal, security, privacy and corporate branding, have been adequately addressed and that the policy is balanced. Second, it increases the amount of buy-in when a diverse group of people is asked to review and comment on the policy draft. This means that the process by which the policy will be reviewed and discussed, along with the feedback, will be incorporated into the final copy. A vetting process that includes social media makes it more likely that this will occur.

How Will We Inform Employees About Their Responsibilities?
Some organizations confuse policy creation with policy communication. A policy should be well-written and comprehensive, but it is unlikely that the policy alone will be all that is needed to instruct employees about their responsibilities for social media. A well-designed communication plan, backed up by a training program, helps to make the policy come to life so that employees understand not just what the policy says, but how it impacts on them. It also explains what the organization expects to gain from its participation in social media, which should influence employees in their social media interactions.

Who Will Be Responsible for Monitoring Social Media Employee Activities?
Once the strategy has been set, the rules have been established and the rationale for them explained, who will ensure that they are followed? Who will watch to make sure the organization is getting the desired benefit from social media? A well-designed training and awareness program will help with this, but managers and the organization’s leader for social media also need to pay attention. Managers need to understand policy and assumptions and how to spot inappropriate activity, but their role is to be more of a guide to support team self-moderation, rather than employ a top-down, monitor-and-control approach.

How Will We Train Managers to Coach Employees on Social Media Use?
Some managers will have no problem supporting their employees as they navigate a myriad of social media sites. Others may have more trouble helping employees figure out the best approach for blogs, microblogs and social networking. There needs to be a plan for how the organization will give managers the skills needed to confront and counsel employees on this sensitive subject.

How Will We Use Missteps to Refine Our Policy and Training?
As with any new communications medium, some initiatives go exceptionally well, while others run adrift or even sink. Organizations that approach social media using an organized and planned approach, consistent with the organization’s mission, strategy and values, will be able to review how well these initiatives meet their objectives and use that insight to improve existing efforts or plan future projects better.

More information is available in the report "Answer Seven Critical Questions Before You Write Your Social Media Policy," which can be found on the Gartner website at http://www.gartner.com/resId=1522014.

 

In addition, I wanted to add the following points:

I am all about the process – And a process for establishing a social media strategy (internal or externally facing) have several process steps which flow sequentially for the varying audience members who will consume or provide this information.

 

First, It is important to understand your corporate strategic goals. And even if social media isn’t explicitly defined, it is certainly an input to several common objectives like acquire/retain new/existing customers (Marketing), World-Class operations (real-time fodder is a great tool for customer service complaints in real time), etc.

Second, you need to functionally understand the impact domains and what purpose a social strategy will provide: which groups will be impacted by a social media strategy, and what, if anything are they already doing to address? Characteristics of a good purpose according to Carol Rozwell:

 

1. Magnetic
2. Aligned
3. Properly-scoped
4. Promotes Evolution
5. Low risk
6. Measurable
7. Community-driven

 

Third, connecting the corporate goals from the strategic plans to the social media purpose / strategy is key – that is what is defined by Aligned and Properly Scoped. All strategic plans evolve over time so why wouldn’t your social purpose evolve as well?

 

Fourth, Measurement. This is near and dear to my heart : Measuring what matters; business intelligence tools are starting to realize the value of offering real-time capabilities to track the chatter across the social sphere; think about my Wynn Hotel examples from previous posts to validate the power this can provide towards improving customer experience, and ultimately affecting long-term retention of your customers.

Community-driven is self-explanatory. You cannot tell a customer what their voice should be, it is what it is.

You as an organization need to understand that word of mouth from your customers is worth its weight in gold; more than the millions spent on advertising budgets and huge marketing campaigns. Communities offer the soap box that so many customers want to stand upon to share their experiences.

You reap the benefits of understanding this voice, and consuming this information in a meaningful and metrics driven approach that can provide context to your strategic goals without augmenting them with cost laden initiatives or proposals.

Posted in Business Intelligence | Leave a comment

“LAURA” Stratification: Best Practice for Implementing ‘Social Intelligence’

Doing an assessment for how and where to learn social media to better understand your business drivers can be daunting, especially when you want to overlay how those drivers affect your goals, customers, suppliers, employees, partners…you name it.

I came up with this process which happens to mimic my name (shameless self-persona plug) to ease the assessment process while providing a guided assessment plan.

First, ‘Learn’ to Listen: learning from the voice of the customer/supplier/partner is an extremely effective way to understand how well you are doing retaining, acquiring or losing your relationships with those who you rely on to operate your business.

Second, Analyze what matters, ignore or shelve (for later) what doesn’t; data should be actionable, (metrics in your control to address), reporting key performance indicators that are tied to corporate strategies and goals to ensure relevancy.

Third, Understand your constituent groups; it isn’t just your customers, but also your shareholders, employees, partners, and suppliers who can make or break a business through word of mouth and social networking.

Fourth, Relate your root causes to your constituents value perceptions, loyalty drivers and needs to ensure relevancy flow through from step 2. Map these to your business initiatives and goals exercise from step 2. Explore gaps between initiatives, value perceptions, loyalty drivers and corporate goals.

Lastly, create Action plans to address the gaps discovered in Step 4. If you analyzed truly actionable data in step 2, this should be easy to do.

To apply this to social media in order to turn it into social intelligence, you need to make the chatter of the networks meaningful and actionable.

To do this, think about this example:

 

A person tweets a desire to stop using a hotel chain because of a bad experience. In marketing, this is known as an “intent to churn” event; when social intelligence reporting systems ferrets out this intent based on scouring the web commentaries of social networks, an alert can be automatically forwarded to your customer loyalty, marketing/social media or customer response teams to respond, address and retain said customer.

A posting might say “trouble with product or service” – That type of message can be sent to customer operations (service) or warranty service departments as a mobile alert.

And a “having trouble replenishing item; out of stock” question on a customer forum can be passed along to your supply chain or retail teams — all automatically.

The Wynn has a great feedback loop using social media to alert them in real-time of customers who are dissatisfied with their stay who Tweet or comment about this during their stay.

The hotel manager and response time will find this person to address and rectify the situation before they check out. And before long, the negative tweet or post is replaced by an even more positive response, and best of all, WORD of MOUTH to friends and family.

Its sad to say, in this day and age, we are often left without a voice or one that is heard by our providers of services / products. When good service comes, we are so starved that we rejoice about it to the would. And why not? That is how good companies excel and excellent companies  hit the echelon of amazing companies!

Posted in Brand_You! Campaign, Business Intelligence Services, Social Networking | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Social Intelligence’, the bridge between social networking and business intelligence, Starts To Build Momentum

Several years ago (in early 2009), I blogged about two of my passions, social networking and business intelligence. It was about the time that business folks starting building their profiles on LinkedIn, extending their networks via Twitter and started realizing that FaceBook wasn’t just a tool for their children to build their socialization skills but was a vehicle for networking with other professionals within and outside of their own personal networks. Grasping the power of the social network was still this abstruse almost arcane concept in its theoretical potential for corporate America. And while there were those visionaries, like the Wynn in Las Vegas, about whom I shared an anecdote within my TDWI presentation on Social Intelligence (one I will share in a moment) later that year, most companies saw social networking websites as distractions and often, banned them from use during the work day.

Why was Wynn different?

As a frequent corporate traveler, I have had many “check-in” line experiences: from the car rental counter to the hotel check-in line, I have had both good and bad experiences. On one somewhat lackluster experience, I was standing in line to check into the Wynn Hotel in Vegas. Several people ahead of me was a gentleman, fairly polished but obviously frustrated by his conversation with the desk clerk. As a highly perceptive observer (or at least, that is how I am spinning being nosy), I listened in on the situation. This gentleman had reserved a junior suite, since he and a colleague were sharing the room, a common occurrence as companies started to tighten their belts around corporate travel expenses. And, the suite was not available. The clerk seemed to want to help but was strapped by her computer system telling her no suites were available until the following night in the category booked. It turns out, she was new.

Quite gruffly, this gentlemen left the line, and proceeded to stand in the lobby, talking to his colleague about the disappointment, and commented that he was going to Tweet (post a message to his Twitter account) that buyer beware when it came to staying at the Wynn. Now, in a city like Las Vegas where capacity can exceed occupancy rates, combined with a name like the Wynn, combined with the sheer reach of a site like Twitter, this kind of negative word of mouth can really hurt a vendor. And more often than not, comments like this are over looked, or at least, were overlooked in the past, because of the lack of technology or reporting to alert such vendors to such disturbances in real time. In a travel situation, do you want to know that your issue was addressed after your trip with a gift and apology in the form of a coupon for choosing the stay there in future?

No…In fact, the breakage rate on such post-trip coupons is 70-80% (remember, I used to work for the largest online travel consortium) :) . Thus, granting coupons is ineffective at winning the customer back. And it is because your trip, whether for business or pleasure, was ruined. And no, I am not being dramatic. You might not think a rooming issue can ruin a trip but it can. In fact, just being placed on the wrong floor or near an elevator or merely any event that is different that you were expecting can ruin a trip from a customer’s perspective.

But, I digress…

Back to my story: As soon as the customer finished posting his Tweet to Twitter, he turned to his colleague and walked to a cafe and sat down to order some refreshments. By the time I reached the front of the check in line, I noticed what appeared to be someone who appeared to be in charge (dark suit, name plate, piece of paper in his hand) approach the gentlemen and start a dialogue with him. Within moments, the two shook hands and the paper (which turned out to be room keys and an invoice) were swapped and the authority figure left about his business.

Intrigued, I walked up and asked the gentlemen what had happened. He was so excited by what had happened that he asked me to wait while he posted a note to Twitter. Since I had heard the original part of the story, I started to deduce what was happening. When he was finished, he said that gentleman was the hotel manager. He had been alerted to the room situation via a Twitter application which alerted management to travel disruptions as they occurred in real time to his smart phone. It was his job to make sure the customers were found in the hotel and the situation fixed to the betterment of the customer, no matter the situation. In this case, the customer was treated to an upgraded full suite, which was available, at no additional cost and given vouchers for the show that evening. The customer was so pleased, he had to go back to Twitter to recant his previous post, and to alert people to how well the situation was handled not days after the fact, but within the hour of it occurring.

I was floored.

You hear about the concept of the customer feedback loop but rarely do you see it implemented well or in a way that can affect overall customer loyalty or perception of the brand. In this case, it not only affected the customer and his colleague, but his entire social network.

Later, I found that same manager and asked his what he used to alert him to the Twitter incident from earlier.

He smiled and said we are in the business of pleasure, thus, it is our job to know when we fail. Alerting in real time is not as hard as you think with the right tools and technology. And left it at that.

Ok, so Vegas is a pretty secretive world of proprietary tools and technology, and are often market leaders when it comes to adoption.

And that is where Social Intelligence comes in: the ability to understand the Voice of the Customer as expressed within the intricate web of the social network via tools and technology. What better tools for alerting and reporting on incidents in real-time than those offered by the Business Intelligence suite of tools (at its most generalized state).

I am so happy to also report that in 2011, BI technology is taking an even larger footprint into the Social Intelligence space. When I can say more, I will. Just know I am really excited about the future ahead of us folks!

Happy New Year readers.

Posted in Business Intelligence, Social Networking | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

50 Ways to Drive Traffic Online

I wanted to share with you this great article I came across – It walks you through the 50 ways to increase online traffic; I would add that if you are interested in building your own personal brand, or the “Brand YOU”, then this article is a must read:

http://www.gathersuccess.com/blogging-tips/50-ways-to-drive-traffic-online

 

 

Posted in Brand_You! Campaign, Laura Edell, Laura Gibbons, Social Networking | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Personal Peer-Production & Shameless Self Plugs

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2007/may07/05-09BINewDayPR.mspx

 

http://www.eiseverywhere.com/ehome/index.php?eventid=4983&tabid=929

Posted in Business Intelligence | Leave a comment

Applying the Bing Decision-Engine Model to “Business Intelligence” and Other Musings

Yes, folks, I am back. Wait, didn’t I write that before.

Well, after having my 1st child, I spent many months (just shy of 10, to be exact), noodling business intelligence, and the concepts I had previously discussed on my blog. For the last 5 years, I have been touting the need for better search integration, offering up the BI mashup concept before people really understood what a plain vanilla dashboard was, and was met by glazed stares and confusion. Now that folks are catching on to the iGoogle experience, and the ability to “mashup” or integrated several points of interest or relevance into a dashboard, I want to discuss this topic again. But, this time, I want to apply the concept of the Decision Engine instead of just the Search Engine when it comes to ways to make BI content more meaningful, more relevant and more useful to end users.

Side note: “mashup” is still not a recognized word in the spell-check driven dictionary lists for the greater population of enterprise applications.

Coupled with my mashup passion was my belief in eye-tracking studies. Eye-tracking measures the human behavior of looking at something and measuring the concentration of the eyes on a particular area of a particular object of interest, say a website for example. In the case of business intelligence, I applied eye-tracking studies to the efficacy of dashboard design in order to better understand the areas where the human brain focused concentration vs. those ignored (despite what the person might say was of interest to them).

Advertisers have known about eye-tracking studies for years, and have applied the results to their business. For example, the eyes will focus on the top left corner first. Whether a TV screen, a book, a piece of paper or a dashboard. It is the area of the greatest concentration. Therefore, special importance has been paid to the piece of advertising real estate. And since the popularity rise of folks like Stephan Few of recent or Edward Tufte, whose design principles for effective dashboard design have driven many a BI practitioner to rethink the look and feel of what they are designing, this concept of top left is more important has become commonplace.

And, the handful of other book grade principles have risen to the surface too: less is more when it comes to color, overuse of lines in graphs is distracting, save pie for desert (pie charts, that is), etc.  But tying it all together is another story all together. Understanding how human perception, visual perception and dashboard design meet is a whole other can of worms, and usually requires a specialized skill set to fully “grok” (sorry, but I love Heinlein’s work). :)

Excuse my digression…


Take a look at this image which shows eyetracking results from the three most popular search engines in 2006:

 

Notice the dispersion of color measured in the Yahoo and MSN examples vs. Google. This is correlated to the relevancy of the results and content presented on the page. And 4 years ago, Google’s search engine was a popular go-to tool for many when it came to finding related websites to help answer questions. Fast forward 4 years, and MSN is now Bing, and what was the search engine is now the dubbed “decision engine.”

The advent of the decision-engine in my eyes is because of the dilution of search engine effectiveness based on the flood of results presented to end users. In fact, I am sure the results of an eye tracking study from 2010 would be vastly different as a result of the exponential growth of web-based content available for crawling.

The same has occurred within enterprise business-intelligence platforms. What was introduced as powerful has really become inundated with content, in the form of reports, objects, dimensions, attributes, attribute elements, actual metrics, derived metrics and the list goes on and on.

Superficially, search was introduced as an add-on to the enterprise BI platforms. An add-on; really, an afterthought.

To the credit of the solutions on the market (grouped into a collective unit), people didn’t realize what they didn’t or better put, needed to know when building the technology behind their solution offerings. And they needed to start somewhere. It was only after BI became more mass-adopted in corporate America, and the need grew pervasive into even the smallest Mom and Pop shop for some level of reporting, that people began to realize that getting the visualizing the data was one thing; finding the results of those visualizations or data extractions was an entirely different can of worms.

At the same time as this was happening, the search giants started innovating and introducing the world to the concepts of real-time search and the “decision engine” named Bing. Understanding the statistical models behind how search algorithms work, even simplistically, understanding enough to be dangerous, is a key that any reader of this blog and any BI practitioner would be smart to invest their own time into doing. 

In a nutshell, my belief? Applying those principles and eons of dollars thrown at optimizing said models (by the search giants) is an effective way for BI solutions at any level to leverage the work done to advance search research and technology, instead of just patching BI platforms with ineffective search add-ons. Just look back at the Golden Triangle study graphic above, and remember that long before BI design experts like Tufte and Few said it, advertising gurus knew that the Top Left real estate of any space is the most important space to reach end users. So, instead of thinking of search as a nice add-on for your BI platforms, why not see it as a necessity. if a report is loaded into a repository and no one knows about it, was it ever really done? Let alone meaningful or valuable enough to be adopted by your end users? Think about it…

Posted in Business Intelligence Services | Leave a comment

TDWI NW Chapter Summer Social Event: Warehousing Over Wine


http://twtvite.com/badge/?twt=TDWI_WarehousingOverWine

Come out to the TDWI NW Chapter Summer Social event on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at 5:30 – 8:00 PM at the Goose Ridge Tasting Room – TDWI members, non members, BI and DW enthusiasts, or those just interested in meeting new people – Come one, come all!

Posted in TDWI | 2 Comments